Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Vet. App. 548

Fleshman v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · decided 1996-11-22

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 5103

Relies on Isenhart v. Derwinski

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-11-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2012

30199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

KRAMER, Judge,

¶1concurring:

¶2The appellant’s unexecuted claim cannot provide the basis for an earlier effective date on at least one, and perhaps two, other bases. First, because the appellant never returned the application form forwarded to him for execution, he is not entitled under 38 C.F.R. § 3.155(a) (1995) to the filing date of the unexecuted claim. Second, assuming that because a claim is unexecuted it is missing requisite evidence, the appellant’s claim was incomplete under 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) and Isenhart v. Derwinski, 3 Vet.App. 177 (1992). Because the appellant was notified of such missing evidence, his failure to provide it within one year precludes the award of an earlier effective date. Third, again assuming that because a claim is unexecuted it is missing requisite evidence, the appellant’s failure to provide the missing evidence within one year after being requested to do so resulted in an abandoned claim under 38 C.F.R. § 3.158(a) (1995), a circumstance which cannot give rise to an earlier effective date.

/9/vetapp/548 · .json · Public domain