Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Vet. App. 67

Thomas v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · decided 1996-04-09

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 7104

Relies on Smith v. Brown · Duran v. Brown · Winslow v. Brown

Decided 1996-04-09

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On March 19,1996, the Court consolidated the above-captioned cases. On March 28, 1996, the Secretary filed a motion for leave to respond to the parties’ petitions for extraordinary relief.

¶3Upon consideration of the pleadings, it is

¶4ORDERED that the Secretary’s motion for leave to respond to the parties’ petitions for extraordinary relief is granted. It is further

¶5ORDERED that, within 30 days after the date of this order, the Secretary file (and serve on the other parties) a response to the petitions. The response shall address, but not be limited to, the following:

Whether 38 U.S.C. § 7104 requires VA to allow the petitioners’ appeal of the issue of “clear and unmistakable error” in the respective VA regional office decisions to proceed (by issuing a Statement of the Case) despite the apparent lack of legal merit to the claim. See Smith (William) v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1527 (Fed.Cir. 1994); Duran v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 216 (1994); Winslow v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 469 (1996).

¶6It is further

¶7ORDERED that, within 30 days after service of the Secretary’s response, the other parties may file replies.

/9/vetapp/67 · .json · Public domain