Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Wash. App. 13 - Strode v. Gleason

9 Wash. App. 13 - Strode v. Gleason’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
8
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably 332 Pa. Super. 48 - Bartanus v. Lis (1984), 94 Wash. 2d 99 - Wyman v. Wallace (1980)

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

11019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Funk v. United States · Montgomery v. Crum · 77 Wash. 2d 649 - In Re Stranger Creek · Miller v. Monsen · Pickle v. Page

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. An existing family relationship[;] 2. A wrongful interference with the relationship by a third person[;] 3. An intention on the part of the third person that such wrongful interference results in a loss of affection or family association^] 4. A causal connection between the third [party's] conduct and the loss of affection[;] 5. That such conduct resulted in damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “cannot be said to have occurred until some overt act takes place which shows a want of affection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “malicious alienation of the affections of a minor child”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.