Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Wash. App. 246 - State v. Pyles

9 Wash. App. 246 - State v. Pyles’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1986
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 48 Wash. 2d 545 - In RE OLSEN v. Delmore · 78 Wash. 2d 9 - State v. Zornes · 55 Wash. 2d 469 - State v. Collins · 72 Wash. 2d 760 - State v. Eike · 47 Wash. 2d 640 - State v. Partridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The thrust of this opinion is that if the facts of the case will support a charge of negligent homicide, the prosecutor must charge negligent homicide. The legislature intended to create two separate and mutually exclusive crimes. The Fourteenth Amendment does not allow the prosecutor, at any time, to make a choice between manslaughter and negligent homicide. State v. Collins, supra; Olsen v. Delmore, [ 48 Wn.2d 545 , 295 P.2d 324 (1956)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We believe that the negligent homicide statute, RCW 46.61.520, preempts the manslaughter statute, RCW 9.48.060, whenever there is substantial evidence that the victim's death occurred as a proximate result of the operation of any vehicle by any person (1) while under the influence of or affected by intoxicating liquor, narcotic drugs or dangerous drugs, or (2) in a negligent manner no matter what degree of negligence is involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “one person with manslaughter (20-year maximum penalty) and another with negligent homicide (10-year maximum penalty) for the same act committed under the same circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.