9 Wash. App. 766 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably State v. Smith (1975), 13 Wash. App. 782 - State v. Clark (1975)
46 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Mempa v. Rhay · Escoe v. Zerbst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, even though probation revocation is not a stage of criminal prosecution, when one is entitled to a full panoply of his constitutional rights, a revocation hearing may result in a loss of conditional liberty, and due process standards must be met. See Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S. Ct. 2593 , 33 L. Ed. 2d 484 (1972); Gagnon v. Scarpelli, [ 411 U.S. 778, 781 , 36 L. Ed. 2d 656 , 92 S. Ct. 1756 (1973)]. At the hearing the probationer must have an opportunity to be heard and to show, if he can, that he did not violate the conditions; or if he did, that circumstances in mitigation suggest the violation warrants action other than revocation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beer · State v. Beer“"Clearly the end and aim of an appearance before the court must be to enable an accused probationer to explain away the accusation. The charge against him may have been inspired by rumor or mistake or even downright malice. He shall have a chance to say his say before the word of his pursuers is received to his undoing."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`must have an opportunity to be heard and to show, if he can, that he did not violate the conditions; or if he did, that circumstances in mitigation suggest the violation warrants action other than revocation.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Canfield
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.