Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

90 A.D.2d 843

Matuozzi v. Matuozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1982-11-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1988

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-11-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In related matrimonial actions, the wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), dated February 25, 1982, which (1) denied her motion to amend her answer in the action brought *844by her husband and to consolidate her matrimonial action with her husband’s action and (2) granted the husband’s cross motion to strike the wife’s statement of readiness. Appeal dismissed, insofar as it relates to the wife’s motion, without costs or disbursements (see Matuozzi v Matuozzi, 90 AD2d 844). Order affirmed, insofar as it relates to the husband’s cross motion, without costs or disbursements. Special Term properly granted the husband’s cross motion to strike the wife’s statement of readiness since there was no statement as to the status of the discovery proceedings. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.

/90/ad2d/843 · .json · Public domain