Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 AD3D 736 - Scott v. Gresio

Scott v. Gresio’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
July 2012
most recently cited

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the defendant asserted that those alleged injuries did not constitute a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d at 352 , 746 N.Y.S.2d 865 , 774 N.E.2d 1197 ; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d at 955-956 , 582 N.Y.S.2d 990 , 591 N.E.2d 1176 ), his examining neurologist recounted, in an affirmed report submitted in support of the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, that range-of-motion testing performed during the examination revealed the existence of a significant limitation of motion in the region (see Walter v. Walch, 88 A.D.3d 872, 872 , 931 N.Y.S.2d 248 [2011]; Cues v. Tavarone, 85 A.D.3d 846, 846-847 , 925 N.Y.S.2d 346 [2011]).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.