Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 Ariz. 356 - Grummel v. Hollenstein

Grummel v. Hollenstein’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Gilmore v. Cohen (1963), Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. Ellsworth (1968)

26 state decisions

120196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jacob v. Miner · MacKey v. Spangler · 88 Cal. App. 2d 171 - Engasser v. Jones · Caveny v. ASHEIM · Cole v. Atkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether or not a court will award damages when specific performance cannot be enforced, depends upon the particular facts involved. The general rule is discussed in 49 AmJur., Specific Performance § 173 (1943): “ ‘As the rule is often laid down, a court of equity will not grant pecuniary compensation in lieu of specific performance unless performance has become impracticable, or unless the case presented is one for equitable interposition such as would entitle the plaintiff to performance but for intervening facts, such as the destruction of the property, the conveyance of the same to an innocent third person, or the refusal of the vendor’s wife to join in a conveyance, which would render the decree useless or inadequate.’ ” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A complainant will not be denied legitimate relief merely because he might have misjudged the proper theory. If the facts legally proven under the pleadings entitled plaintiffs to relief under any theory, the court should award the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.