In Re Pulliam’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably In the Matter of Frank E. KNIGHT, Debtor-Appellant (1995), Nicholes v. Johnny Appleseed of Washington (In Re Nicholes) (1995)
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 303
Relies on Ohio v. Kovacs · Daye v. Attorney General of New York · Butler v. United States · Stewart v. Kutner · In Re All Media Properties, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] guaranty of collection, which is also known as a conditional guaranty, enables the creditor to seek payment from the guarantor only after the occurrence of some condition 'such as the condition that the creditor has unsuccessfully and with reasonable diligence sought to collect the debt from the principal debtor.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A guaranty of payment, which is also known as an absolute guaranty, requires the guarantor to pay immediately upon the principal obligor's default.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.