Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 Cal. App. 4th 1177 - Bratcher v. Buckner

90 Cal. App. 4th 1177 - Bratcher v. Buckner’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services · 8 Cal. 4th 791 - Ghirardo v. Antonioli · 5 Cal. 3d 730 - County of Alameda v. Carleson · Miller v. Johnson · Kahan v. Seror

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One is considered, `aggrieved' whose rights or interests are injuriously affected by the judgment. [Citations.] Appellant's interest `”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “must be immediate, pecuniary, and substantial and not nominal or a remote consequence of the judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “to enforce the objective intent of the parties”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.