Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

90 Colo. 284

8 P.2d 1112

Craddock v. Craddock

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 15, 1932

Supreme Court of Colorado · decided 1932-02-15

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1986

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-02-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Opinion

Per Curiam.

¶2 Mr. Justice Alter has not participated in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Adams and Justices Burke and Campbell are of the opinion that it should be affirmed, whereas Justices Butler, Moore and Hilliard are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As it must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

¶3 Judgment affirmed.

/90/colo/284 · .json · Public domain