Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 F.1d 720 - United States v. Four Bottles Sour-Mash Whisky

United States v. Four Bottles Sour-Mash Whisky’s Empirical Analysis

90 F. 720 · 1898

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
April 1920
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1920

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

601898190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kan-Gi-Shun-Ca · Johnson Graham's v. William M'Intosh · Bates v. Clark · Spalding v. Chandler · United States v. Cook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A stock of liquors is not introduced into the Indian country by being transported across an Indian reservation to a place whore the owner may lawfully dispose of it, and is not subject to seizure while in transit, nor after arrival at its place of destination.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.