Shinholt v. Angle’s Empirical Analysis
90 F.2d 297 · 1937
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 1983
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission · Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States · Loy v. Alston · Louisville & N. R. v. United States · Flint River Pecan Co. v. Fry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The question presented [is] not whether the Court should grant the ultimate relief sought. That question [is] being transferred to another tribunal. The question [is]: Upon a consideration of all the facts, would harm result to either party as a result of the granting or denial of the stay, and were there probable grounds for an appeal to protect rights which might be prejudiced by a refusal to grant the stay? (emphasis added)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.