Concentrate Mfg. Corp. v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis
90 F.2d 439 · 1937
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 1962 · most notably Shelton v. Gill (1953), Campana Corp. v. Harrison (1940)
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. · Hill v. Wallace · Lipke v. Lederer · Graham v. du Pont · Regal Drug Corporation v. Wardell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although we cannot therefore say that there are no exceptions, they are at best only when the taxpayer is put to the direst necessity, and can make out a case of gross and indisputable oppression, without adequate remedy at law.” At pages 440-441.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.