United States v. Nardone’s Empirical Analysis
90 F.2d 630 · 1937
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2001
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 550 · 19 U.S.C. § 1593 · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Olmstead v. United States · Olmstead v. United States · Tingley v. United States · Schoborg v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person; . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.