Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 F.3d 1150 - Mitchellace, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Mitchellace, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

90 F.3d 1150 · 1996

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. St. Francis Healthcare Centre (2000), National Labor Relations Board v. Dickinson Press, Inc. (1998)

20 federal appellate ·

1901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Gregory v. United States · Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Reavis v. Antinore · National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Board's findings with respect to whether an election reflected the 'fair and free choice' of the employees 'will not be disturbed on appeal where there is substantial evidence ... to support its conclusions.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “These factors include: (1) the timing of the misrepresentation; (2) whether the employer was aware of the situation and had an opportunity to respond; (3) the extent of the misrepresentation; (4) whether the source of the misrepresentation was identified; and (5) whether there is evidence that employees `actually were affected' by the misrepresentation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'materially affected the result of the election.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.