Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 F.3d 1200 - Montgomery v. Meloy

Montgomery v. Meloy’s Empirical Analysis

90 F.3d 1200 · 1996

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Sellers v. Ward (1998), Mason v. Hanks (1996)

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

190199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · McCleskey v. Zant · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ujnless state collateral review violates some independent constitutional right, such as the Equal Protection Clause” (citing Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 484-85, 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963))), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 907 , 117 S.Ct. 266 , 136 L.Ed.2d 190 (1996); Dickerson v. Walsh, 750 F.2d 150 , 150-53 (1st Cir.1984) (adjudicating capital defendant's Equal Protection claim because”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “delay in receiving a ruling on a discretionary state collateral appeal is not a ground for federal habeas corpus relief”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]his argument completely misses the mark.... There is no logical causal connection between [Jones's] attorneys' failure to raise these arguments on direct appeal and [Jones's] failure to raise them in his first petition where he was proceeding pro se.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.