Young v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
90 F.3d 1225 · 1996
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Noel v. Hall (2003), Long v. Shorebank Development Corp. (1999)
29 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Younger v. Harris · Rakas v. Illinois · Gault · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a result, litigants who feel a state proceeding has violated their constitutional rights must appeal that decision through their state courts and thence to the Supreme Court.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[C]onstitutional claims that are 'inextricably intertwined' with state court judgments of necessity call upon the district court to review the state court decision and are thus beyond the district court's jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the litigant challenges the underlying procedure as unconstitutional or instead seeks review of the state court judgment in his case.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.