Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 F.3d 1409 - United States v. Workinger

United States v. Workinger’s Empirical Analysis

90 F.3d 1409 · 1996

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
4
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Hankey (2000), United States v. Wilson (1997)

42 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

2701996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 26 U.S.C. § 1 (Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2008) · 26 U.S.C. § 6531 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 26 U.S.C. § 7212

Relies on United States v. Bass · New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance · Chapman v. United States · Staples v. United States · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Evidentiary rulings will be reversed for abuse of discretion only if such nonconstitutional error more likely than not affected the verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “so that a reasonable juror could find in favor of authenticity or identification.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.