DCD Programs, Ltd. v. Leighton’s Empirical Analysis
90 F.3d 1442 · 1996
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Ambassador Hotel Co. v. Wei-Chuan Investment (1999), Penny/Ohlmann/Nieman, Inc. v. Miami Valley Pension Corp. (2005)
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 771 (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) · 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78B (§ 2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Central Bank of Denver Na v. First Interstate Bank of Denver Na K · Barrows v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The parties' tax liabilities resulted from the ineluctable requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, rather than from any wrongful conduct on the part of defendants.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“benefit of the bargain damages allow plaintiff to recover difference between (1) the value, as represented by the defendant, of the security the plaintiff bought or sold, and (2) the actual fair value of that security on the date of the purchase or sale”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The interest and penalties were not really a damage suffered by . . . [plaintiff], but a return by him of what would otherwise be a windfall resulting from his opportunity to use money to which he was not entitled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Tracy Parker Streber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.