Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 F.3d 245 - Ford v. Wilson

Ford v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

90 F.3d 245 · 1996

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Palmer v. Marion County (2003), Hunt-Golliday v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (1997)

23 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1746 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Delaware v. Prouse · City of Oklahoma City v. Tuttle · Ingraham v. Wright · United States v. Jacobsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 56(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that when a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of the.. .party’s pleading.”). Instead, Braun merely filed a brief opposing the defendants’ motion. (Docket # 58). Likewise, he filed an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “By declaring under penalty of perjury that the [response] was true, ... he converted the [response], or rather those factual assertions in the [response] that complied with the requirements for affidavits specified in the rule ... into an affidavit,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.