Cathedral of Incarnation in Diocese of Long Island Cathedral of Incarnation in Diocese of Long Island v. Garden City Company Inc’s Empirical Analysis
90 F.3d 28 · 1996
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2015
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Church of Scientology of California v. United States · Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca · Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · Atlantic Coast Line Co v. State of Florida State of Florida · Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court to which such claim or cause of action is removed may remand such claim or cause of action on any equitable ground. An order entered under this subsection remanding a claim or cause of action, or a decision to not remand, is not reviewable by appeal or otherwise by the court of appeals under section ... 1291 ... of this title....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress amended § 1334 to allow appellate review of [mandatory abstention] determinations where the district court has decided `not to abstain.' 28 U.S.C. § 1334(d). The legislative history of the amendment strongly suggests that Congress viewed this change as carving out a narrow exception to a general rule prohibiting appellate review of abstention decisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a]ny decision to abstain or not to abstain [with certain exceptions] is not reviewable by appeal or otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Pierpoint v. Barnes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.