Duldulao v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
90 F.3d 396 · 1996
Citation profile
110 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 168 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Kalaw v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1997), Abdul Hakeem v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2001)
110 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Russello v. United States · Reno v. Flores · Mathews v. Diaz · Harisiades v. Shaughnessy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 168 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(10) Any final order of deportation against an alien who is deportable by reason of having committed a criminal offense covered in section 241(a)(2) . . . (C) . . . shall not be subject to review by any court.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]e have regularly applied intervening statutes conferring or ousting jurisdiction, whether or not jurisdiction lay when the underlying conduct occurred or when the suit was filed.... Present law normally governs in such situations because jurisdictional statutes 'speak to the power of the court rather than to the rights or obligations of the parties.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Goodson v. Rowland · 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 330, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 437 in Re Pintlar Corporation Gulf USA Corp., Debtors. Bernard Goodson Ford Elsaessar Lowell Finley and Jay J. Miller, as Trustees v. David J. Rowland Jeremy E. James David L. Hudd Derek J. Moran, in Re Pintlar Corporation Gulf USA Corp., Debtors. Bernard Goodson Ford Elsaessar Lowell Finley and Jay J. Miller, as Trustees v. David J. Rowland Jeremy E. James David L. Hudd Derek J. Moran, and Inoco Plc, a United Kingdom Corporation“'[f]or reasons long recognized as valid, the responsibility for regulating the relationship between the United States and our alien visitors has been committed to the political branches of the Federal Government. [O]ver no conceivable subject is the legislative power of Congress more complete.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1118, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1391 Alonso Antonio Barahona-Gomez Carmen Victoria Vazquez De Barahona Alonso Antonio Barahona-Vasquez Brenda Verzosa Dino Verzosa Humberto Javier-Rivas Bosco Guillermo Rivas Carole Beltran Santiago Ramon Sequeira Graciela De Los Angeles Isariuz Sandra Los Angeles Sequeira Marta Aguilar v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Executive Office for Immigration Review Michael Creppy, Chief Immigration Judge Paul Schmidt, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Alonso Antonio Barahona-Gomez Carmen Victoria Vazquez De Barahona Alonso Antonio Barahona-Vasquez Brenda Verzosa Dino Verzosa Humberto Javier-Rivas Bosco Guillermo Rivas Carole Beltran Santiago Ramon Sequeira Graciela De Los Angeles Isariuz Sandra Los Angeles Sequeira Marta Aguilar v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Executive Office for Immigration Review Michael Creppy, Chief Immigration Judge Paul Schmidt, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals · Boston-Bollers v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.