Booker v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis
90 F.3d 440 · 1996
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2019
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Lockett v. Ohio · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was inapplicable to habeas corpus review. In place of Chapman, the Court substituted the standard established by Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946), for resolving the harmless error issue on the direct review of a criminal conviction. The Kotteakos standard asks whether the error”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“By substituting Kotteakos ' standard for Chapman's, the Court in Brecht made it easier for a state to show that a constitutional violation did not prejudice an habeas petitioner's case. 90 F.3d at 442 (11th Cir.1996) (citations omitted). We have held that Hitchcock errors are”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a Rule 60(b)(6) movant 'must persuade [the court] that the circumstances are sufficiently extraordinary to warrant relief.' Even then, whether to grant the requested relief is ... a matter for the district court's sound discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.