Depass v. Chitty’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably Chiusolo v. Kennedy (1993), Beefy King International, Inc. v. Veigle (1972)
2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stout v. Philippi Manufacturing & Mercantile Co. · Center v. P. & M. Bank · Bridger v. Exchange Bank · Peninsular Naval Stores Co. v. Cox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The general rule is that lis pendens is notice of all facts apparent on the face of the pleadings and such other facts as the pleadings would necessarily put the purchaser on inquiry and of the contents of exhibits filed and proved if they are pertinent to the matter in issue or the relief sought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The term `lis pendens' literally implies a pending suit. The doctrine of lis pendens is defined as the jurisdiction, power, or control which courts acquire over property involved in a suit pending the continuance of the action and until final judgment therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.