Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 FRD 168 - Williams v. Wilkerson

Williams v. Wilkerson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. · Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. · Smith v. Blackledge · Anthony F. McDonald v. Frank A. Hall · Stanley Works v. Haeger Potteries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no clear authority for the rule that parties must attach a copy of the proposed amended pleading to their motion for leave to amend. Nevertheless, because the Court does not believe that such a rule would be inappropriate and because ... authorities ... tend to support such a rule, the Court adopts this rule as the proper procedure to follow in seeking leave to amend a complaint under FRCP 15(a)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.