Steinberg v. Hardy’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 1993 · most notably Gottesman v. General Motors Corp. (1959), Hausman v. Buckley (1962)
11 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a motion by defendant Associated Telephone and Telegraph Company for an order— a) quashing, vacating and setting aside the purported service of the summons and complaint herein upon Associated and dismissing the complaint as to said defendant; b) in the alternative, dismissing the complaint herein on the ground that it fails to comply with the provisions of Rule 23(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.; c) in the alternative, staying all further proceedings herein pending a final determination of issues common to the instant action and the prior pending action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, entitled “Alice Milvy, et al. v. Arthur F. Adams, et al. (Index No. 59-1953)”; d) directing that plaintiffs give defendant Associated security on the ground that said defendant is entitled thereto under Section 61-b of the General Corporation Law of the State of New York, McK.Consol.Laws, c. 23. (2) a motion by defendant Associated Telephone and Telegraph Company seeking, among other relief, an order terminating plaintiffs’ examination before trial of the St. Regis. (3) a motion by defendant Arthur F. Adams for an order— a) staying all further proceedings herein pending a final determination of the prior pending action in the Supreme Court of the State of Now York, County of New York, entitled “Alice Milvy, et al. v. Arthur F. Adams, et al. (Index No. 59-1953)”; and b) staying this case pending a final determination by this Court on”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Milvy v. Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.