Tisa v. Potofsky’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 1994
10 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 29 U.S.C. § 101 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 113 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Polin v. Kaplan · Rogers Park Water Co. v. Fergus · Green v. Obergfell · Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen · Otto v. Protective
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the expulsion remains effective pending the appeal to the convention, which * * * will not be held until October or November of this year. The alleged irreparable violation of F TA’s rights, however, occurs immediately upon expulsion. • Consequently, as a practical matter, there is no tribunal available within the CIO to which appeal can be made to prevent these wrongs. Hence I conclude that the complaint is not premature.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Underwood v. Maloney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.