Harisiades v. Shaughnessy’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1986
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 10 · 18 U.S.C. § 2385 · 18 U.S.C. § 2388 · 5 U.S.C. § 1001 · 8 U.S.C. § 1502 (§ 359 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Thornhill v. Alabama · Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · Stromberg v. People of State of California · Schenck v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Q. You are informed that in addition to the charge contained in the Warrant of Arrest, the following additional charges are now lodged against you. “1) That you are in the United States in violation of the Act of October 16, 1918, as amended, in that you have been found to have been after entry a member of the following class set forth in Section 1 of said Act: an alien who believes in, advises, advocates, or teaches the overthrow by force or violence of the government of the United States; “2) That you are in the United States in violation of the Act of October 16, 1918, as amended, in that you have been found to have been after entry a member of the following class set forth in Section 1 of said Act: an alien who is a member of an organization, association, society, or group that believes in, advises, advocates, or teaches the overthrow by force or violence of the government of the United States; “3) That you are in the United States in violation of the Act of October 16, 1918, as amended, in that you have been found to have been after entry a member of the following class set forth in Section 1 of said Act: an alien who is affiliated with an organization, association, society, or group that believes in, advises, advocates, or teaches the overthrow by force or violence of the government of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.