Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

90 F. Supp. 962

Woods v. Nadel

U.S. District Court

Decided May 31, 1950

U.S. District Court · decided 1950-05-31

Decided 1950-05-31

BYERS, District Judge.

¶1The Court is satisfied that the brokerage paid by the sub-lessee did not inure to the benefit of the defendants in this case, and therefore that the rent paid by the sub-lessee was not enhanced so as to violate the statute; the sub-lessee agreed to pay the brokerage, with knowledge that the tenant in possession, who desired to dispose of her lease, was unwilling to pay a commission to the real estate broker who handled the transaction for her, and this fact was known to the sub-lessee when he entered into negotiations with the tenant of the apartment through the broker who advertised the premises for rental.

¶2Judgment for defendants.

/90/fsupp/962 · .json · Public domain