Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 F. Supp. 2d 1267 - Preston v. Settle Down Enterprises, Inc.

90 F. Supp. 2d 1267 - Preston v. Settle Down Enterprises, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 254 · 29 U.S.C. § 255

Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co. · Armour & Co. v. Wantock · Pennekamp v. Florida · Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Time spent by an employee in travel as part of his principal activity, such as travel from job site to job site during the workday, must be counted as hours worked. Where an employee is required to report at a meeting place to receive instructions or to perform other work there, or to pick up and to carry tools, the travel from the designated place to the work place is part of the day’s work, and must be counted as hours worked regardless of contract, custom, or practice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.