Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 IND 205 - Nave v. Flack

Nave v. Flack’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
9
states following
May 1966
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently May 1966 · most notably Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Means (1914), City of Fort Wayne v. Coombs (1886)

2 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

280188318901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on District of Columbia v. Armes · Bennett v. Railroad Co. · City of Delphi v. Lowery · Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. Fix · Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. Brannagan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Even a negligent contribution does not necessarily bar a recovery. Unless it proximately contributes, mere negligence does not defeat a plaintiff’s action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.