¶1(dissenting) : I dissent from paragraph 2 of the syllabus and that portion of the opinion which holds it to be unnecessary to produce excluded evidence on a motion for a new trial, as required by section 307 of the civil code. (Clark v. Morris, 88 Kan. 752, 129 Pac. 1195; Caldwell v. Modern Woodmen, 89 Kan. 11, 130 Pac. 642; Cheek v. Railway Co., 89 Kan. 247, 131 Pac. 617.)
90 Kan. 675
Treiber v. McCormack
Decided November 8, 1913
Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1913-11-08
<p>Appeal from Pottawatomie district court; Robert C. Heizer, judge.</p>
Relies on Cheek v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. · Caldwell v. Modern Woodmen · Clark v. Morris
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed · Decided 1913-11-08
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 1966
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →