Eckhardt v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1930
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tootle, Wheeler & Motter Mercantile Co. v. Floyd · Home Lumber & Supply Co. v. McCurley · Baker Wire Co. v. Kingman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The provision of the lease regarding the keeping up of the fence was not ambiguous, and, within the authority of a case recently decided by this court, could not be affected by evidence of a local custom.” (p. 701.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bellport v. Harrison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.