Commonwealth v. Buckley’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2259 (§ 40113 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on 134 S. Ct. 1710 - Paroline v. United States · Glaubius v. State · United States v. Tyler · Commonwealth v. Nawn · United States v. Kearney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Restitution may be ordered only for those economic losses adequately documented by the victim and established by the Commonwealth”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]here must be a sound basis in the evidence for the calculation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because the judge found that the parties had reached an agreement on the amount of restitution that should be paid to the victim, the decision in Commonwealth v. Henry ... does not affect our analysis”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.