Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 MASSAPPCT 449 - Commonwealth v. Suters

Commonwealth v. Suters’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · United States v. Matlock · United States v. Calandra · Mincey v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonable person in the position of the police officers would understand that any consent that may previously have been given by [his wife] with respect to entry into [that] room was withdrawn”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In sum, the third factor of the analysis ..., which is especially significant because it is tied to the purpose underlying the exclusionary rule, does not favor suppression of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.