¶1The writ will be granted vacating the order of the circuit judge, denying the application of relator to have the books containing the account of the ¡umbér transactions deposited in the court; and, while the writ will not issue to the full extent as prayed, the court below is directed to hear the application, and to make such order as will give relator a full and fair opportunity to examine such books of account before the hearing of the accounting, so that he can prepare himself therefor.
90 Mich. 265
Petrie v. Dickerman
Decided February 10, 1892
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1892-02-10
Mandamus. Eelator is complainant in Petrie v. Torrent, 88 Mich. 43, in which case an accounting was ordered on the sale by the defendant of pine lands, of which complainant held a verbal option, and which were deeded to defendant, who furnished the purchase money, under an agree•ment to give complainant one-third of the net profits resulting from the transaction.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1899
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1892-02-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →