Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 MISS 111 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 1977
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1977

9 state decisions

4019071910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant was the only witness to the fact in his own behalf, and the charge would have been no stronger if it had called his name and cautioned the jury, in its own language, to ‘take into consideration the interest such witness may have in the result of the trial.’ His testimony should not be so hampered by such express reference.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.