State v. Askin’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1985
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Harkins · Pridgen v. . Gibson · State v. Simonis · Sesser Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To give medical opinion evidence, witness need not be physician and surgeon if he possesses necessary experiential qualifications. * * * “Mere fact that witness was physician and surgeon, without evidence of actual experience in, or study of, subject under consideration, held insufficient to qualify him as expert.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carter v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.