Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 Mont. 91 - Novack v. Pericich

Novack v. Pericich’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1955
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1955

5 state decisions

30193119401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. St. George v. Justice Court · State Ex Rel. Bevan v. Mountjoy · Miller v. Miller · Boucher v. St. George · State ex rel. Skrukrud v. District Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the St. George and Bevan cases, supra, are fundamentally unsound, and we subscribe to the conclusion here announced solely on the ground of stare decisis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “at least four days before the time for appearance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.