Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

90 N.C. 202

Saylor v. . Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1884

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1884-02-05

Civil Action tried at Spring Term, 1883, of ANSON Superior Court, before MaoJRae, J. This is a creditors’ bill filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants, who are the widow and son of Henry Powell, deceased, who died intestate, and seized and possessed of the house and lot, in the town of Wadesboro, described in the complaint. The son and only heir was more than twenty-one years of age, and was the administrator of the intestate’s estate.

Decided 1884-02-05

Ashe, J.

¶1 The only question presented for the determination of this court is, whether the defendants, or either of them, are entitled to a homestead in the house and lot.

¶2 The claim set up by the widow for a homestead is decided in the case of Wharton v. Leggett, 80 N. C., 169, where it is held that, under article ten, section live of the constitution, a widow is not entitled to a homestead in the lands of her husband, if he die leaving children — minors or adults.

¶3 And the defendant B. F. Powell is not entitled to a homestead, either under the constitution or under the act of 1877, ch. 253. It is alleged in the complaint that he was twenty-one years old, which is not denied. So that even if he was a minor when his father died, and he was then entitled to a homestead, the right ceased as soon as ho attained his majority. Const., Art. X, §3. Nor is he entitled to it by virtue of the act of 1877, for that act has been declared to be in violation of the constitution of the state. Wharton v. Taylor, 88 N. C., 230.

¶4 There is no error. Let this be certified, that the case may be proceeded with in accordance with this opinion and the law.

¶5 No error. Affirmed.

/90/nc/202 · .json · Public domain