Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

90 N.C. 710

State v. . Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1884

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1884-02-05

INDICTMENT for burning an uninhabited house tried at January Term, 1884, of CUMBERLAND Superior Court, before dlaePute, J. The indictment was found at fall tern:, 1883, and is in substance as follows: The jurors, &c., present that the defendant, &c., did unlawfully, wilfully, maliciously and feloniously set-lire to and burn a certain uninhabited house, the property of J. C. Blocker, with intent to destroy said house and to injure said Blocker, contrary, &c. The jury-…

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1884-02-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1966

3 state decisions

10188418901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Asiie, J.

¶1 The defendant is indicted for burning an uninhabited house, which by statute is made a misdemeanor (Bat. Rev.,' ch. 32, §93), and the defendant moved to arrest judgment upon the ground that the offence, being only a misdemeanor, is charged to have'been done “ feloniously,” and that the indictment was therefore defective. But this court has repeatedly held that the use of the term “feloniously” in an indictment for a misdemeanor does not raise the grade of the offence, and the word is to be treated as surplusage : that calling a misdemeanor a felony does not make it one. State v. Slagle, 82 N. C., 653 ; State v. Watts, Ib., 656 ; State v. Slaton, 88 N. C., 654; State v. Upchurch, 9 Ired., 454. There is error.

¶2 Error.

¶3 Reversed.

/90/nc/710 · .json · Public domain