90 N.C. App. 101 - State v. Compton’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2019
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Houltin v. United States · 42 Cal. 2d 246 - People v. Ashley · Van Hoff v. Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco · State v. Cronin · State v. Agnew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [A] false representation of a past or subsisting fact or a future fulfillment or event, (2) which is calculated and intended to deceive, (3) which does in fact deceive, and (4) by which the defendant obtains or attempts to obtain anything of value from another person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the evidence [was] insufficient to enable the jury to find that he did not intend to comply with [a] contract and convey the property ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Maier“recognizes the danger that juries may improperly infer criminal intent merely from a defendant's failure to carry out his promise[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Maier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.