Martin v. Hutton’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 1949
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gerner v. Mosher · Omaha Electric Light & Power Co. v. Union Fuel Co. · Rogers v. Walsh · Warder, Bushnell & Glessner Co. v. Myers · Stewart v. Cowles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The plaintiff was not required, as a condition precedent to prosecuting this action, to rescind the contract. The defendant did not own the land, was not the government’s agent, and gave the plaintiff nothing except information concerning the location of the real estate.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gould v. Bester
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.