In Re Sackman’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2005
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Toomer v. Witsell · Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont. · Hicklin v. Orbeck · In re Gordon · Salorio v. Glaser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“meant. 1967 Editorial. Critics suggested that the proposed revision would allow attorneys who predominantly practiced in New York or Philadelphia to meet the requirement by attending a New Jersey office on a regular but infrequent basis. Id. Furthermore, some members of the New Jersey bar feared that this revision would make it more difficult for people to secure qualified and committed counsel. Id. They believed that New Jersey residents would be better served by local counsel who would be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“For the purpose of this section, a bona fide office is a place where the attorney or a responsible person acting on the attorney’s behalf can be reached in person and by telephone dui’ing normal business hours. A bona fide office is more than a maildrop, a summer home that is unattended during a substantial portion of the year, or an answering service unrelated to a place where business is conducted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Kasson“[t]he premise ... that the mere fact of living in New Jersey makes it more likely, and more to the point, sufficiently more likely, that that lawyer will be more competent, accessible and accountable than the one who is living in another state[,] ... [if] true, ... is only marginally true.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bach v. Pataki
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.