Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 N.M. 169 - Romero v. Melbourne

Romero v. Melbourne’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1991

14 state decisions

80197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lee v. People · Mayer v. Sampson · Gonzales v. General Motors Corporation · Shuey v. Asbury · Stephens v. Dulaney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] judgment will not be reversed by reason of an erroneous instruction, unless * * * the evidence indicates that without such error in the instructions the verdict probably would have been different from the verdict actually returned by the jury. (Cites omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.