Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

90 N.M. 191

561 P.2d 464

Kendall v. State

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1977

New Mexico Supreme Court · decided 1977-03-09

Relies on State v. Bell · State v. Kendall

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-03-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably State v. Duran (1988), State v. Hutchinson (1983)

43 state decisions

16019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 OPINION

SOSA, Justice.

¶2 Defendant was convicted of fourteen felonies and one misdemeanor. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. Kendall v. State, 90 N.M. 236, 561 P.2d 935 (Ct. App. 1977). We granted certiorari.

¶3 The only issue we entertain is the Court of Appeals’ reversal of defendant’s conviction of criminal sexual penetration because of the trial court’s failure to instruct that the jury must find that the victim was other than defendant’s spouse, and the resulting remand for new trial on the issue. The reversal was improper under the facts of the case. State v. Bell, 90 N.M. 134, 560 P.2d 925 (1977). The defendant was properly convicted of criminal sexual penetration, and his conviction is affirmed.

OMAN, C. J., and McMANUS, EASLEY and PAYNE, JJ., concur.
/90/nm/191 · .json · Public domain