Chino v. Chino’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Padilla v. Pueblo of Acoma (1988), State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Jojola (1983)
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1321 · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on Williams v. Lee · McClanahan v. State Tax Commission of Arizona · Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation · Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones · Samuel Worcester v. The State of Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the parties are Indians or non-Indians, (2) whether the cause of action arose within the Indian reservation, and (3) what is the nature of the interest to be protected”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“deny(ing) Indians the opportunity of developing their own system.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“to extend the concept of concurrent federal and state jurisdiction to cases which arise in areas set aside by treaty for the exclusive use and control of Indians.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.