Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 N.M. 608 - State v. Castrillo

State v. Castrillo’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2020 · most notably State v. Sutphin (1988), 31 Cal. 3d 503 - Stone v. Superior Court (1982)

1 federal appellate · 74 state decisions — followed in 11 states

280197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Green v. United States · Downum v. United States · United States v. Josef Perez · Zanfardino v. United States · 66 Cal. 2d 459 - People v. Griffin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he record is not clear as to which of the included offenses the jury was considering at the time of its discharge. Without inquiry by the trial court into the jury’s deliberations on the greater, included offenses, no necessity is manifest to declare a mistrial as to those offenses and thus jeopardy has attached. Jeopardy did not attach to the offense of voluntary manslaughter which was the least of the included offenses. Had the jury reached a unanimous decision on that offense it could not have been in the posture it announced to the court.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Henceforth, when a jury announces its inability to reach a verdict in cases involving included offenses, the trial court will be required to submit verdict forms to the jury to determine if it has unanimously voted for acquittal on any of the included offenses. The jury may then be polled with regard to any verdict thus returned.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “record [was] silent upon which, if any, of the specific included offenses the jury had agreed and upon which the jury had reached an impasse”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.