¶1ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIO-RARI MEMORANDUM OPINION
¶2The writ in this case was granted on the same basis as the writ in the case of Padilla v. State, 90 N.M. 664, 568 P.2d 190 (1977). In view of our holding in Padilla v. State supra, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
¶3IT IS SO ORDERED.
¶4ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
¶5This matter coming on for consideration by the Court upon motion for Rehearing, and the Court having considered said motion and brief in support and being sufficiently advised in the premises;
¶6NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Motion of Petitioner for a rehearing be and the same is hereby denied.